NPR, Liberal Bias, Healthcare and You
I’ve just been listening to National Public Radio (NPR) while running errands on a drive across town.
The show was about the controversy surrounding government funding for NPR itself, and one of on-air personalities suggested that the common view that NPR has a liberal bias is just plain wrong. Really? I doubt it.
Truth is, he just can’t see it. We all have biases on most common issues. I don’t believe there is any such thing as a “totally unbiased” news report on a controversial subject.
As I was getting energized about responding to NPR via email, it occurred to me that it was probably pointless, and my mind went to the biases I often detect in coverage of healthcare issues. So I thought I’d channel my energy into this blog and stay within my area of expertise.
Let me start with the story of a fictional patient, “Steve.”
Steve passed away yesterday at the age of 55. He had been a pack-a-day cigarette smoker since high school and never “got around” to quitting.
Last month Steve started coughing up blood, and a chest X-ray showed a mass in his right lung. After appropriate testing, he was diagnosed with early stage lung cancer and scheduled for surgery.
The operation went well but postoperatively he had complications including blood clots, pneumonia and an intravenous catheter-related infection in his bloodstream. Despite aggressive treatment in the Intensive Care Unit for these conditions he became progressively ill and died on the fifth postoperative day.
Upon review of his chart, several avoidable but common lapses in the usual treatment protocols were identified.
Although these mistakes may have made it more likely for Steve to have the postoperative complications, no one can say for certain if they did or did not cause the problems that directly resulted in his death.
The question for you is, what killed Steve?
Think about it for a minute or two before reading beyond this paragraph. Do you think it’s obvious? Perhaps that’s your bias showing up. I’m an expert in health and healthcare, and it’s not obvious to me.
Some would say that the “medical mistakes” or medical errors killed Steve. After all don’t we hear about medical mistakes killing hundreds of thousands of Americans every year? Especially from the lawyers?
Certainly that would be the argument of the malpractice attorney retained by Steve’s wife, but this is just one view.
Another view is that Steve would never have needed the surgery if he had not been a lifelong cigarette smoker. This is certainly true. If he hadn’t smoked, or if he had quit much earlier, he would not have died yesterday.
So did cigarettes kill Steve? Maybe.
That depends on how you look at it. And if you agree that it was the cigarettes more than the medical errors, then you face another question. Who was responsible for Steve’s tobacco abuse?
Was it purely due to “Steve’s choices,” or was it a result of the influence of tobacco companies that work to create the admittedly addictive habit of smoking? Hard questions all.
So, you see it’s not so easy now to know what killed Steve. Many will argue that it was the poor state of the healthcare system. Others will say it was the evil tobacco companies. Some will say it was Steve’s choices.
A lot depends on your own biases, and biases may cause us to oversimplify complex issues. And let’s be honest — our biases also tend to build us up, to protect us from responsibility. We don’t want to think that we’re the problem.
I’m not asking you to get rid of you biases. I’m asking you to recognize them.
Next time, you hear about “medical mistakes killing hundreds of thousands of people each year,” I want you to remember that healthcare isn’t perfect and that most of that care involving mistakes was probably only necessary because of lifestyle choices by the patients.
How about you? Could you be living an unhealthy lifestyle and have a bias towards blaming others for your illness? Believe me it happens.
If it didn’t we wouldn’t be talking so much about healthcare. We’d be talking about more health and less care.
Be well.
